Geography must not be a factor
by Gavin Rich 24/01/2002, 00:00
This may irritate some, but here is the reality - the next coach of the Springboks will be a Cape man.
Yes, like it or not, Harry Viljoen's successor as Springbok coach will be based
at the business unit, which has moved in with employees of SA Rugby (Pty) Ltd
into the offices previously occupied by SARFU on the top floor of the Sports
Sciences Institute in Cape Town.
That means the Springbok coach will continue to live in closer geographic
proximity to players and officials from the Cape.
More significantly, the main
decision maker will continue to be exposed to the leanings and opinions of the
WP besotted Cape press more than the media of any other province.
Put another way, if the new coach is from outside of the Cape, he will
relinquish much of his contact with the officials and players that he worked
with when he coached at Currie Cup and Super 12 level.
The reason I point all of this out is because of a disturbing statement spotted
in a newspaper after Harry Viljoen's resignation as Springbok coach: "Already
it is being said that we must not have another Springbok coach who comes from
the Cape".
This would presumably mean that Gert Smal should be disqualified from the race
for the fact he lives in Cape Town. Rudolf Straeuli would come into the
equation because he is from outside the Cape. And those who proposed Andre
Markgraaff doubtless did so on the sole basis that he did not hail from a
coastal province.
Ah, how complicated provincialism makes this whole business of choosing a
Springbok coach. What we are saying here is that the new guy should not
necessarily be the best, but should come from the right place.
Now I would be the first to agree that some Springbok teams of the not too
distant past have been too overloaded with Cape players and at times there has
also been an overload of Cape philosophy. Nick Mallett was probably a lot more
guilty of this than Harry Viljoen.
But we have to pity anyone who would consider clouding such an important
decision with considerations such as the candidate's current place of domicile.
A few years ago, there may have been reason for the apparent leaning by
Springbok coaches towards players they had coached at provincial level. Ian
McIntosh, when he was appointed, continued to live in Durban. As he spent large
parts of the year without a team to coach, it was understandable that he was
fairly frequently spotted on the King's Park outerfields watching his former
team train.
It was also not a complete shock to see him present at the odd Natal Rugby
Union function. The same could be said for Mac's successor, Kitch Christie. He
continued to live in Johannesburg, and this enabled him to see the talents
offered by Transvaal second-stringers (hooker Chris Rossouw) and under-21
players (scrumhalf Bennie Nortje was invited to a Springbok training camp).
Presumably it was because he also lived in Kimberley, which is a relatively
small place, that Andre Markgraaff, when he coached the Boks in 1996, saw
something nobody else in the country could see when he decided Griquas flanker
Theo Oosthuizen was a worthy replacement for Francois Pienaar.
Of course, living in the same place did not always mean you went with players
from that region. I know Mac read a lot of the pro-Natal garbage I wrote in the
Natal Mercury during those years, but I never could sway him into selecting
Gary Teichmann and Dick Muir.
That was left to subsequent coaches to do.
And Carel du Plessis, when he coached in 1997, clearly never took any notice of
what myself (Cape Argus) or Mark Keohane (Cape Times) thought of some of his
selections.
The point of all of this is that in the professional era the old provincial
arguments live on only in the minds of journalists and disaffected
players/officials with an axe to grind - the latter group of course still being
all too prevalent in our rugby.
If Rudolf Straeuli does become the next coach, what is he? Is he a former Blue
Bull and Transvaal flanker, or is he the most recent Natal coach who for some
reason should still hold some allegiance to that union?
For the record,
Straeuli was at university at Stellenbosch and has thus spent more of his life
in the Cape than in Durban.
Of course Smal is not a good example as he did play for WP, but it is a fact
that there is less of that old loyalty you used to see in the amatuer era, when
someone like Hugh Reece-Edwards retarded first his development as a player and
later his potential as a coach by refusing to be disloyal to the province where
he had been taught the game.
There are those who would argue the point, but although he was based in the
Cape, Viljoen was never really regarded as a WP man by the Newlands die-hards.
He had, after all, built his coaching reputation in Durban and Johannesburg.
True, there were a lot of WP players in the Bok squad at the start of last
season.
But during the course of the year Viljoen dropped Percy Montgomery when
many felt the Cape man was playing his best rugby. He also left out Braam van
Straaten when the rest of the country - yes, even those in the north and in
Durban - thought he should be a must at flyhalf.
On Viljoen's first tour with the Boks he ignored the claims of WP lock Hottie
Louw, who he generally treated very shabbily. And now we come to his biggest
mistake of all - the omission of Corne Krige from the initial squad to tour
Britain and Europe late last year.
Was not this the same Krige who captained
WP, supposedly Viljoen's province, to two momentous Currie Cup successes?
Talk of Krige brings me to another point. There are many outside Cape Town, and
some in the city, who are hoping that Viljoen's departure might mean the end of
Bob Skinstad as captain.
But if Skinstad does go, which I don't believe he should, who is the obvious
man to replace him? I would say that the aforementioned Krige should be the
obvious, maybe the only, choice.
Yet he comes from the Cape, surely not something to recommend him to the many
who feel that the supposed WP dominance of the Bok team should stop.
Surely that example should be enough to highlight the silliness of adding
geography to the already complicated set of parametres that South African rugby
officials and Springbok selectors have to work with.
If Smal is deemed to be the best available candidate, then he should be
appointed.
Likewise any English, French, Japanese, Mauritian, Portuguese,
Asian, American, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, male, female, heterosexual or
homosexual who has the right credentials for the job...