Don't Condemn Straeuli on basis of Cup final
by Gavin Rich 01/11/2001, 00:00
They may not be the top team on the field but the Natal Sharks and their entourage easily outstrip all other comers when it comes to the art of losing graciously.
The large Sharks sponsored billboard pinned up outside Cape Town airport
welcoming Natal fans to "Whine country" is still there almost a week after the
final whistle sounded on their failed attempt to wrest the Currie Cup title
away from Western Province.
Only there is now one significant difference to the billboard - the jibe at
Cape rugby's propensity for whingeing has been crossed out and replaced by a
strip which congratulates WP on winning the trophy. A Sharks advert echoing
similar sentiments also appeared in a Cape Town newspaper on Thursday.
WP have basked in their glory this week - and there is no denying they deserve
all the accolades. It was indeed a magnificent Currie Cup season for the blue
and white hoops, marred only by the solitary defeat to the Sharks on a day when
the result mattered not a jot.
Yet while the best team in the country took the Cup, some of the comments and
opinions that have circulated since the final are a little over the top. I
dealt elsewhere on this site earlier in the week with the view that Natal
choked. They did not choke - on the day there were beaten by a better team.
But it is important to emphasise the words "on the day". While Natal's lack of
variation on attack has been well documented and I have expressed the view that
more than anyone else the Sharks missed an inform Butch James, there was not
really that much seperating the teams at Newlands.
The Sharks seemed genuinely surprised at the ferocity of the WP forward
onslaught after halftime. By the time they woke up the flow of the game had
changed and the Cup was out of reach. These things happen.
But the record between the Sharks and WP over the past few seasons does not
back up the theory which seems prevalent in Cape rugby and journalistic circles
that if the two teams met in 10 games the Province team would win seven or
eight of them.
On the contrary, WP director Rob Wagner is probably right in
saying that matches between these top teams are always 50/50 affairs,
regardless of the venue.
WP do possess more subtlety and fire-power at the back, but there have also
been many days in the past few years when the Province backs have not seen the
ball in matches against Natal.
The Natalians have been described as dull, yet it is a fact that they scored 43
tries in the buildup to the final - exactly the same number as WP, who had
their tally significantly boosted by one match against Free State towards the
end of the top eight phase of competition.
Even in the final they were outscored in the try count and can thank their
lucky stars for the metronomic efficiency of Braam van Straaten.
Although much
maligned at stages of the season (I was one of his biggest critics), Van
Straaten singlehandedly kept WP on the winning trail when often they played
poorly enough to lose.
But what has inspired this column is the completely unfounded criticism of
Sharks coach Rudolph Straeuli. It started in the hours after the match when
people, many of them Durbanites who had been wholly supportive beforehand,
wondered whether he had the bottle to push his team through in the big games.
What really took the cake was the opinion expressed in some Cape newspapers
that Straeuli's failure to win the final should have been taken as a sign that
he was not a realistic pretender for Harry Viljoen's Springbok coaching
position.
What was overlooked here was the fact that Viljoen's first three Currie Cup
final appearances all ended in defeat (I also seem to recall there was a Lion
Cup final defeat or two thrown in for good measure).
For the record, Straeuli has presided over Natal and Sharks teams that have
lost in three finals - two Currie Cup and one Super 12. Viljoen's record in
provincial or regional competitions shows four Currie Cup final appearances and
three defeats.
His one season in the Super 12 was a complete disaster and does
not compare favourably with Straeuli's miraculous transformation of the Sharks
from wooden spoonists in 2000 to finalists in 2001.
Straeuli should not be judged on his record in finals. Both the sides that his
team has lost to in his three finals are class acts with a healthy smattering
of experienced international players. If success in Currie Cup finals was used
as the criterion for choosing the national coach, then Gert Smal, who has won
two in two starts, should be taking the Boks to Europe instead of Viljoen.
It would be fairer to judge Straeuli on what he has done for Natal rugby in the
just 18 months since he took over. Yes, let's not forget that just 18 months
ago, maybe even less, Straeuli was coaching at lowly Border and had had little
or no contact with the Natal players he now coaches.
That in such a short space of time he has guided the Natalians to three finals
is an indication that he must know his rugby oats. And it needs to be noted too
that Natal were not an established team, which to some extent WP have been for
the past few seasons, when he took over.
Straeuli took over at a difficult time in Durban as Natal rugby was starting
out on a new era after the retirement of former coach Ian McIntosh and a number
of long-serving stalwarts.
It takes a while for a team to mature fully and in that sense it may be
instructive to repeat here the Natal team that started the 1999 Currie Cup
final against the Lions:
Andre Joubert, Shaun Payne, Trevor Halstead, Joe
Gillingham, Justin Swart, Clinton van Rensburg, Hentie Martens, Gary Teichmann
(captain), Wayne Fyvie, Charl van Rensburg, John Slade, Steve Atherton, Brent
Moyle, Mornay Visser, John Smit.
Some of that number played in last Saturday's final against WP, but not one was
in the same position that he had occupied three years ago (Charl van Rensburg
only came on as a replacement). By contrast WP last week fielded no less than
nine players who were regular starters in the Stormers' impressive Super 12 run
at the start of 1999.
This needs to be taken into account by those who are now rushing to condemn
Straeuli because his young team did not take the extra step from becoming
contenders to being champions. Considering the route Natal have followed in 18
months, that next step might not be far
away.