Should Lance just quit?
by Cycling Guest 17/07/2010, 12:08
On the long road into Paris, nearly every day still left on this Tour de France is going to be a reminder of the champion that Lance Armstrong once was but no longer is.
Take, for example, stage 14 looming this Sunday, when the Tour
will clamber high into the Pyrenees mountains to Ax-3 Domaines.
That ski station was the setting for a vintage Armstrong
performance in 2005, when he was still a genuine, no-holds-barred
competitor, not the haggard has-been - as a rider, at least - he
has become.
His rivals threw everything they had at Armstrong that day. On a
long, steep climb up to the Port de Pailheres pass - which the Tour
will cross again on Sunday - they brutally wore down Armstrong's
teammates by riding furiously. Without his support riders to help
him, the six-, going on seven-time champion, was forced to fend for
himself.
Not that isolating him made any difference. "In that situation
you either fight back or you run away," Armstrong said. He, of
course, fought. Yet again, he trumped them all.
That was the Armstrong of old - in control, seemingly
invulnerable, never ready to surrender. Had they ever met
face-to-face, it is hard to imagine the Armstrong of then having
much time or sympathy for the ersatz version of himself now.
Over the years, the Tour has seen many facets of Armstrong:
angry, funny, courteous, prickly, triumphant, gracious, mean,
considerate and, most of all, determined. Frighteningly determined
- sometimes to the expense of everything else.
But we had to wait until this Tour, Armstrong's 13th and last,
to see the man who defeated cancer simply capitulate, put his hands
on his hips in resignation and ruefully shake his head. It was a
giant shock when that happened on stage 8, on the Tour's very first
day in the high mountains. Because it was so unexpected, so
unthinkable, the day that Armstrong surrendered will become part of
Tour lore, along with all those times when he was so dominant.
Armstrong can justifiably point to a host of reasons why his
final Tour fell flat. There was the punctured tire on day 4 that
hobbled him when the race veered over cobblestones. There was
intense summer heat, which he has never liked. There were
relentless questions, again, about whether he has ever doped. And
there were crashes, nasty ones that left Armstrong with cuts and
bruises.
But most of all, 38-year-old Armstrong just looks past it,
jaded, almost uninterested. As early as day 3, he already was
joking that he perhaps should have stayed retired. Four stages
later, as he picked through an unappetizing snack of rice, eggs and
peas to recharge his energy after another hard day of riding,
Armstrong was looking forward to soon never again having to put his
body through the discomforts of the Tour.
It is to Armstrong's credit that he still aims to reach the
finish in Paris even though he is no longer in contention for the
podium or even for a top 10 place.
That is a mark of respect not
only for his sponsors and teammates but also to his fans and, most
of all, to the race that made him fabulously wealthy and famous. In
that way, Armstrong is proving to be more gracious as a loser than
he sometimes was as a boorish and arrogant winner. On Friday, as
the Tour pedaled hard through the hills of south-central France,
Armstrong playfully stuck out a tongue for the camera. The message:
I'm more human than perhaps I seemed when I was beating everyone.
"It would be easy to say I've had some bad luck, I've had some
crashes, I'm outta the race and I'm going to go home," Armstrong
said earlier this week. "But that's not the commitment I made to my
team. That's not the commitment I made to RadioShack. You know, I
had a lot of good luck over seven years, and I guess it caught up
with me."
Going home early might have made it easier for him to duck
reporters' inquiries about the federal probe in the United States
looking into allegations that Armstrong and other riders doped.
From the comfort of his mansion, Armstrong could simply have
ordered his lawyers to rattle off yet another statement dismissing
Floyd Landis' accusations as garbage. Instead, Armstrong spent 15
minutes with reporters before stage 10 answering dozens of
questions about the probe. Granted, his answers have now led to
more questions. But at least he didn't try to hide.
Perhaps the investigation will prove that Armstrong cheated when
he was at the height of his powers. Or perhaps, as he insists,
there's no wrongdoing on his part to prove.
Either way, now just eight days of Armstrong's era remain. They
will take him and the millions of us who have followed his fortunes
over the years back through some of his old stomping grounds - the
Pyrenees, of course, but also to Bordeaux, through which he passed
on the narrowest of his Tour wins in 2003, and finally to Paris.
Armstrong could, by now, already have been sunning himself on
that beach he has been talking about. But instead he is seeing out
his story to its bitter end. For that, he should be applauded.
By John Leicester, Associated Press.