Rugby Football Cricket
Bulls Jomo Cosmos AB de Villiers
Cheetahs Kaizer Chiefs Titans
Griquas Orlando Pirates Cape Cobras
Sharks Rugby Sundowns Golf
WP Rugby SuperSport United Nedbank Challenge
The Stormers Other SS Golf Shootout
Phumelela
Premier Soccer League
SA Rugby
Sports Trust
Sunshine Tour
Kenyan Premier League
FA Zambia
 
Home Rugby Cricket Football Golf Motorsport Cycling Tennis Athletics Aquatics Boxing Schools Climbing Xtra
CricketChampions trophy report card........
by Mike Haysman | 30 September 2009 (23:21)
Where are we with this Champions Trophy deal? It was a tournament that the ICC were touting as the saviour for 50 over cricket. It was supposed to rekindle the enthusiasm for this struggling version of the game by pitting the best against the best in anticipation of fascinating and intriguing results. Well, think again.

If we are brutally honest, what we have seen has been pretty dull cricket. Yes, we have seen some upsets but they have been largely dictated by the qualities of the surfaces that have been played on. That aspect has been a huge negative and one that is normally not associated with cricket in South Africa. How two pitches that are a mere 40 kilometres apart can be so different in nature escapes me. When batting at the Wanderers, first and foremost on the striker’s mind is survival and that is far from ideal. Cricketers want to play one day cricket on true, consistent tracks so that natural skill levels can be expressed to the maximum. What they have had during this event has stifled flair and in some cases elevated ability. So far, with the semi final stage looming, we have only had one close encounter and that was on the last day of the minor round and that is not a recipe for success.

The crowds have been predictably disappointing overall with capacity support afforded to only the home team. The West Indies have been a disaster and that well chronicled spat between their normal international regulars and the WICB has resulted in acute embarrassment. I can just imagine how some of the proud and patriotic Caribbean stars of yesteryear must be mortified by the current scenario. For the sake of quality, I feel the ICC should have ruled with an iron fist and rejected the second rank team that is wearing maroon in Gauteng. Their participation has done nothing but detract from the event.

Again, as viewers, we have been subjected to that tedious period of play between 20 and 40 overs where the only avenue of excitement and discussion is when the batting captain is going to employ the batting powerplay. No need to discuss that in any great detail as unimaginative use of that powerplay has again dominated proceedings. It makes absolutely no sense to continue as is until the last 6 or so overs unless there are still two frontline batsmen carving up the attack. Those death overs are generally always going to go for plenty so that strategy is inconsequential and will have little effect on the outcome. Why not get the opposition on the back foot and have them scrambling to cover bases when two batsmen are in complete control and on the charge? I would suggest the ideal time, in a perfectly structured innings, is to take that batting powerplay around the 35th over. The ball would have just been replaced, it is harder and will travel quicker off the bat, the batsmen are in and performing in a calculated manner rather than engaged in death slogging, and very importantly the opposition will not be expecting it.

So here is my final checklist. The cricket has been severely hampered by the playing conditions. The lack of crowd support has deflated atmosphere. The quality of one team has sabotaged consistent excellence. The strategic planning regarding batting powerplays has been ineffectual. Twenty middle overs of tedium per innings in matches that went the distance have tested the patience.

Let me throw one more aspect into the mix that is definitely a sign of the times. Do we have the time these days in our often frenetic lifestyles to watch 100 overs to conclude what is supposed to be an action packed one day encounter that regularly unfolds as a one sided affair?

Let’s hope the semis and the final fire up or the post mortems will continue.


Recent ColumnsMike Haysman

  • Greenbacks & quarterbacks
  • Cricket, coffee....and Angelina Jolie
  • A novel idea.....
  • Happy New Beer.....
  • Umpires decision review needs urgent review decision....
  • Makhaya: from zero to hero
  • So how's my luck?!!
  • Winning ugly
  • The umpire who cheated death ....
  • Will they never learn?
  • The worst case of mistaken identity ever in the world....
  • Treading a familiar path in Bangalore ......
  • From one champion to another...
  • Champions trophy report card........
  • We meet again ......
  • Cricket's superpower arrives
  • Contrasting cricket
  • Tough Tillakaratne
  • Monkey business
  • A long distance trunk call
  • Finger trouble
  • Hero Herath.....
  • Instinctive cricket rules
  • Arthur or Martha...
  • More to come…….
  • All Columns


    Afghanistan hopes to defeat America
    Steyn is all that's on Dhoni's lips
    Fireworks expected at Derby match
    Extra T20 match for Windies-SA series
    AB`s Tour Diary
    An ideal test-match performance
    Dale Steyn and Hashim Amla were the heroes of our victory...
    Ken Borland
    Is Van Zyl the man for SA?
    A word or two from Corrie van Zyl during the tea interval...
    Derek Alberts on tour
    Derek's diary from India
    The flight from Johannesburg to Mumbai is around nine hours...
     
     
     
    Do you agree with Smith's declaration when Amla had 253 not out?
    Yes, no time for sentiment
    No