Sober up and sort it out
by Neil Manthorp 10/03/2005, 11:26
Some tense and inflammatory things have been said by all three sides in recent weeks about the embarrassing central franchise cock-up that has cost the game so much in terms of cash and reputation and, sadly, we do not appear to be on the verge of change.
An outbreak of common sense is desperately needed and someone needs to
set the example to illustrate that compromise does not necessarily have to
be as painful or as devastating as everyone seems to believe. Just look at
the Eastern Cape.
The review committee set up by the UCB (which includes two prominent and
respected individuals in former government minister Kader Asmal and legal
beaver John Smith) has quite a job on its hands.
The onus should be on Cricket South Africa and the UCB (almost
exclusively the same people) to set the example of reconciliation that needs
to be followed. Having read far more pages of legal argument on this subject
in recent months than I care to count - but it's well over 700 - I am
convinced that Griquas have a case for unfair treatment. "Unfair treatment"
is not what the attorneys and advocates call it but my job is to translate
their language, not repeat it.
In my considered opinion as a layman, Griquas presented a carefully
planned, well-constructed case for the central franchise to be situated in
Kimberley.
Unfortunately, also in my opinion, the CSA committee appointed to
award the franchises did not give the proposal due consideration because
they could not see beyond some stark realities. There are a mere 25 clubs in
the Griquas region and air transport is limited.
Basically, the
infrastructure is inferior to Bloemfontein's - but that does not mean the
decision should have been made in haste or predetermined.
That Griquas and the UCB came within days of appearing in the High Court
is a sad indictment of the quality of some of the leaders of the game in the
country. Others are caring, conscientous and accountable, but some simply
cannot see beyond the end of their
noses. They are involved in
the game of cricket for what it can do for them, and the devil can take the
rest.
I was in the Free State last week for a very important game of cricket.
Afterwards a very important administrator stood at the bar of the
President's Suite entertaining a group of my colleagues while I wrapped up
my final reports for radio and SuperCricket. He was in fine form.
He called me lots of names, including - when he was trying to be serious -
'Neil Manfield.' He used plenty of swear words and said I knew "nothing." He
then said, absolutely decisively, that I hadn't even seen the relevant court
papers because "there's no way he could have."
Well, I did. I read as much as I could because I actually care about
resolving the issue for the good of the game in this country. The franchise
system simply has to work and if Border and EP can make it work, then Free
State and Griquas sure as hell can.
But then my colleagues told me of their evening and I started to despair
once again. The administrator, who has been involved at the highest level
for over a decade, has never made a single attempt to greet me, let alone
have a conversation or question my motives or sources. Instead, he called me
names.
Whatever the grown up version of knocking heads together is, Cricket
South Africa needs to start doing it. Starting with a few of their own.